Thread: Do you like the movies?
<<  
In the Book grond simply came along and busted the gates open.
In the movie they first try using a battering ram standard then they bring in grond. Why do you think that is? They wanted to show how powerful and menacing Grond was so they would show how easily it busted down a gate that was unhindered by a normal ram.
This is a very good tactic to me. But if we look at it logically it makes NO sense. Why would Mordor spend such a long time making a superb ram like grond to then first try the gates with a normal ram?
When you analyse parts you can see they make no sense in reality but WHY they were put in.
The balrog is gone, Sauron cannot come - he used the WK. If he hadn't the audience would think that 'Oh well gandalf will lead them right, for he is unmatched'. The WK as a deadly foe to Gandalf however inspired the watchers more becuase they didn't know what would happen.
I agree with what has been said above - the impact of PJ's changes is exacerbated by the impact of great scenes true to the books.
You can please some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time but you cannot please all of the people all of the time.
(Why oh why did he do that to Faramir? - that's my pet whinge!)
Mine too, Vee, mine too. Faramir just would NOT have done what he did in the movies. It just wasn't in his nature. Ugh! So frustrating!
I think Vir was displaying his usual wit and sarcasm.
I believe he was complaining about PJ's killing of the girlie leader of the Elven contingent during the Battle of the Hornburg.
Oh, and the Battle of the Pelennor (the climax of the series, ) once more from the top: when thousands of heavy cavalry show up on infantrys flank (much less undisciplined Orcs) the latter don't turn 180° on a dime to face them. They die, painfully, messily and quickly. Books of have been written on how to turn an infantry formation, and the bottom line is you turn pikemen on the march; that's why it's called a "turning MOVEMENT!" And it's not accomplished quickly even with the best troops, which Orcs are not. There's three ways I know to stop a charge of heavy cavalry: archers behind pikes facing the horses, a stout and well disciplined hedge hog/porcupine/pincushion or a counter charge. When your pikes get flanked, the only remaining viable option is the last one, but that's not we saw in the movie, we saw the Orcs, all however many tens of thousands of them, neatly pivot around to face the charge. Bull. They get ridden into the turf their blood rapidly turns to mud. Or a lance clean through their middle; take your pick....
I don't exactly know why, if the Orcs have stopped proceding forward, the Pikes cannot then just come to the side which is about to be attacked (remember Theoden is a fair way off in the film) and then all the pikeman lower there pikes. What exactly are you trying to say? That all the orcs were so compact that they couldn't move between eachother? If so then you will notice that they are only very compact at the beginning of the battle. When they start entering Minas Tirith they loosen up.
But when we go to "Go home, Sam!" I almost walked out of the theater. The unbreakable friendship of Sam and Frodo is one of the great themes of the Trilogy, and even if that weren't true, you don't just turn around from Cirith Ungol and "go home" from Mordor.
You are absolutely right! I felt the same way about the battle with the Wargs, and Aragorn falling off of the cliff. Do you really think Legolas and Gimli would simply look over the edge, and say, oh well, farewell then. No way! They would have been looking for him as desperately as they were looking for any sign of the hobbits. He was only the last Heir of Elendil afterall. Grrrr...
*I still like the movies though...even with all of these frustrations. Perhaps it is just the feeling they give in general with the scenery and music and such..."
And the EE also showed what pains he took to shoot some scenes--especially the one that he shot last with Elijah Wood in Frodo's study. He made Elijah do the scene over and over because he was so reluctant to end the whole thing. And then when PJ finally could not make Elijah do it again, he called it, and cried on Elijah's shoulder. It's all there on the last movie's EE.
So why he thought it "necessary" to make the changes he did is something of a mystery, even when there is an explanation given. Drama does not demand the number he made. Certainly, even allowing for artistic differences, he could have asked Tolkien experts and even the fans what they wanted. I think he did consult the fans before putting out the EE's--but I think PJ's own interpretation won out.
As I said, before the 10th anniversary edition comes out, someone needs to mount a campaign that he make some further editing--yes, even if he has to call the cast together and reshoot! It's been done--he did it for the EE's. This is the only way I can think of to return the movies to the standard we all expected of them.
What would be more constructive is trying to get him to do a really good Silmarillion trilogy - that would be a wicked film. The Hobbit I beleive is already planned?
But the simple response is, yes, infantry, particularly medieval infantry, have a long history of falling over each other when suddenly outflanked, while the far more mobile cavalry literally rides circles around them or through them until they're dead, which is why commanders then and now went to great pains to see that didn't happen. True, this is a principle any strategic computer game employs, but it's origins are far more ancient. If you want to blame someone for my notation of it, talk to military, combat and literary veterans like Robert Adams, Robert Jordan and, of course, Professor J.R.R. Tolkien. There's a reason the Rohirrim arrived when they did, one Jackson completely missed.
Oh, yeah, and I'd forgotten/repressed the whole one-warg-KOs-Isildurs-Heir thing, but as I said elsewhere, Aragorn's a wee bit tougher than that (I've always thought the blood of Beren ran as pure in his veins as Luthiens in Arwens, but can't cite proof.) It did however give Jackson a chance for an utterly gratuitous dream sequence where he and Arwen have a telephathic tryst. While we're on the subject, the Professor would never have made the other half of his heroic Christ figure the disgusting cad who led Eowyn on throughout the film version of TTT. In fact, "the real" Aragorn went to great pains to make it clear he had two alternate futures: 1) dead inside of a month, two, tops or 2) you're very hot, but I'm taken. That's the kind of stuff for which I can't forgive Jackson, because a whole generation of fans is going to grow up believing that's the way it happened; when they think of the Trilogy THAT'S the story they'll remember: the one where Frodo told Sam to go take a long walk off a short peer because Gollum snowed him, Aragorn was a horndog who got pushed around by Wargs, and Gandalf routinely had spell slinging contests with Saruman et al. Heck, I still encounter people who ought to know better (I wouldn't name names even if I wasn't too tired to remember them) who think Saruman was Saurons mindless lackey like in the films, even though Gandalf makes it quite clear HE was snowing SAURON and playing for time to find the Ring himself. And the real tragedy is these were no brainers; all he had to do was say "read this book, speak these lines" and it was done, but the seemingly impossible challenge was making it all happen in Middle-earth, not just a cheesy Hollywood set. He managed to give us a gripping and credible story of Middle-earth; the problem is it was the wrong story.
If Jackson gets a hold of the Silmarillion I'm not sure what I'll do, and if I was, I couldn't print it here.....
Edit: I also agree with the comments on Faramir; Faramir wasn't Boromir, thanks to Gandalf (and Finduilas, no doubt) and even if he had been, if the Ring goes to Osgiliath... game over, no more quarters.
I think you nailed it, Gandalf: it's the PROFESSORS story, Mr. Jackson; you're just adapting it.
Exactly. The movies are an adaptation, not the filming of the books. So if you don't agree with that adaptation, don't watch it or wait for someone else to make an adaptation that follows the book to the letter. Or make one yourself, instead of ranting and moaning about it (something I myself was very familiar with not too long ago, unfortunately).
I would rather die with seeing a second class Silmarillion film than no silmarillion film at all.