Thread: The Hobbit 2.
I'm not sure how most of UT, [i:3evjlvau]The Silmarillion[/i:3evjlvau], or anything of Farmer Giles relates to [i:3evjlvau]The Hobbit[/i:3evjlvau]. If you meant as separate projects I could see your point, though I have no desire to see filmmakers/scriptwriters go and 'flesh out' Tolkien's unfinished stories (as would be necessary). As for Farmer Giles I must admit I've never read it, but since it's not Middle-earth-oriented I have a feeling a lot of people would be disappointed (regardless of how good the movie is itself). I'd probably go see it though.
Do you think the hobbit films will be titled as, part 1 and part 2 or will someone get creative and try to come up with a title for each part.
My suggestions would be, part one as The hobbit, There. and part two as The hobbit, and back again. Ofc I am joking.
Incidentaly who thinks the second film should open with Smaugs decent onto Erebor? I would be interested to see his actual purge of the mountain. And it fits with the vision of expanding the main story.
movie two: There and Back Again
it would be simple, yet fair. just an idea
into it somewhere....to make it sound more badass.
I think the first one will be called [i:spb2jdq2]The Hobbit[/i:spb2jdq2] and the second will have its own name, or perhaps it's own subtitle (i.e., [i:spb2jdq2]The Hobbit: ____[/i:spb2jdq2]). I really don't know, but I doubt it'll just be part 1 and part 1.
[quote:spb2jdq2]Incidentaly who thinks the second film should open with Smaugs decent onto Erebor? I would be interested to see his actual purge of the mountain. And it fits with the vision of expanding the main story.[/quote:spb2jdq2]
You mean a flashback to when he first came there? That could be quite interesting ... somewhat like the flashback to the finding of the Ring in [i:spb2jdq2]The Return of the King[/i:spb2jdq2]. It could definitely work, though I'm not entirely fond with the whole notion of expansion to begin with.
movie two: There and Back Again[/quote:3e4p90os]
I don't think [i:3e4p90os]There and Back Again[/i:3e4p90os] would work for the second movie because the "There" part has already been done and it's just being at the destination and then returning. I suppose they could call the first movie [i:3e4p90os]There[/i:3e4p90os] and the second one [i:3e4p90os]Back Again[/i:3e4p90os] for an overall title of [i:3e4p90os]There and Back Again[/i:3e4p90os] though.
part 2. and back.
I'm looking for the official " Hobbit, the " website. Does anybody can help me?
I hope you'll stick around here and discuss [i:931y70ds]The Hobbit[/i:931y70ds], LOTR, Middle-earth, Tolkien, and more. It can be pretty fun.
I agree. It's one book and one story, I see no reason why it shouldn't be one movie. Other than that they are adding to the story, but if we're on the subject of what [i:1mt55qom]should[/i:1mt55qom] be then I don't think they should do that either!
[quote:1mt55qom]Haha. Don't mind me. [/quote:1mt55qom]
Nah, I like talking with people. Welcome to the forum!
Haha. Don't mind me.
90% of these are crap, so 2 Hobbit movies a bridging movie a book of unfinished tales the Silmarillion even Farmer Giles of Ham can all be made into movies. think that would be great.