Thread: Star Wars
Anyways, feel free to jump right in and create a healthy discussion. May the force be with you!
But this refers mostly to the IV,V and VI episodes as they were realy good as a scifi movie for that time and moreover - their idea was strong and that's why these films haven't lost their charm till nowadays.
As speaking of the last three episodes I can only say they were great in two things: quality - the visual effects and all the features were super,I got much pleasure of watching all the 3 on the big screen; and the other great point was that they reminded us of all we knew so well and made us say "Aha! It has been that way!" and of course that very music again!! But as for their life, I beleive it will be shorter and the "Star Wars" will stay mostly as the first trilogy.
He should have left well enough alone.
True, Eruwen. I don't feel that we needed any explanation for the old movies and how everything happened. I never wanted to know how it all began. I just care how it ended. And anyways, no movie can be called Star Wars if Darth Vader is not in it.
I'm not a big fan of Phantom Menace, mainly because of Jar Jar Binks. If there is one thing that bugs me about Lucas, it's that stupid slap-stick element he insists on putting in his films. Doesn't anyone else get tired of seeing 3CP0's head stuck on back to front, or attached to a bad guy? It's a joke that probably raised a laugh in one film, but did not need to be relentlessly carried on as a theme in the others.
That is what I liked most about Revenge of the Sith.... he had made the film darker, and left out that slap-stick, cheap laugh humour. I'm not a huge fan of the series, but Revenge of the Sith I really do like. Lots of action, lots of eye candy, lots of turmoil, some great acting.... and it finally answered the question of how he was going to complete the circle to arrive back at the start. To me, that one film stands out so far from the crowd.
I'll stand back now and be bombarded by rotten apples from the true fans.
I'm not a huge fan of the series, but Revenge of the Sith I really do like. Lots of action, lots of eye candy, lots of turmoil, some great acting....
I do agree there was a lot more action and the "eye candy" and the "turmoil" (or whatever you meant by it) but the acting department really sucked (which is usual). Hayden is a really disappointing choice to play Anakin. I also thought the romance between Anakin and Padme was overdone but then I never liked mushy stuff anyways.
I'll stand back now and be bombarded by rotten apples from the true fans.
Well, sadly, I'm out of rotten apples. But will pies suffice?
The old trilogy rocks! No doubt about that! But I think Revenge Of The Sith is absolutely fabulous! Right up there with the oldies!
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/40165740/
P.S. This is allowed right? If this is advertising or something or if it violates PT rules, feel free to delete the post. Just tell me the reason :-)
While I don't hate the new trilogy, I was disappointed in it mainly because of how Lucas explained the origin of one of the greatest villains in movie history, Darth Vader. It just seemed so hokey. And of course, this could be because Hayden Christiansen (sp?) was so wooden that he would've made anything look bad. To me, they should've condensed episodes 1 and 2 and made Anakin's fall from grace into two movies. His whole "I think the Jedi are evil" attitude just seemed so forced to me.
Regarding Star Wars in general, is it wrong to not think of it as science fiction? I consider it more of a fantasy story where the setting is in outer space instead of a place like MIddle Earth. Star Wars, to me, is more similar to the Lord of the Rings than it is to Star Trek.


