Thread: HP Deathly Hallows w/SPOILERS
NOTE: See HP Deathly Hallows NO SPOILERS if you don't want to know how it ended.
-----> WARNING: SPOILERS BELOW <-----
And how I wondered about that doe... Which part did you like best? At the moment it's the part where Slur says 'Harry, look... at... me..'. I think it stands out because I didn't understand it untill later in the book, then it hit me in the heart I had to go back and read it again. 'sniff'
Yes, I did wonder about the lovely doe, but I don't understand your word "Slur"; was that the translation of Professor Snape's name in the Norwegian edition? If so, then yes that was a the most poinient part of the story and made even more sense to all his previous savings of Harry's life in the earlier books, than mere one-up-manship with James.
A most satisfactory ending, even if we did have to lose a few favorite characters getting there, but then such is life.
A 'Well done!' to JK Rowling.
I don't understand your word "Slur"; was that the translation of Professor Snape's name in the Norwegian edition?
Indeed it is. I keep using his Norwegian name for some reason. Maybe becauase it is a word with meaning in both languages, so I don't notice the mistake as I would would with names which are clearly Norwegian.
The other characters are disappointments, but then, they have been for the past three books, so I guess I wasn't really expecting much better. Ron and Hermione became more and more washed out, as were the Malfoys, the rest of the Weasley, and Neville and Luna. The only characters that seemed to matter in this book seemed to be Harry, Dumbledore, Snape, and Voldemort. I am satisfied with Snape, but the initial lies about Dumbledore's past seemed fairly obviously false, and it did nothing but frustrate me to find Harry disturbed by them, because it was obviously just Rowling trying to grow emotions in a blank character. The truth, when revealed by Aberforth, was anti-climactic and absolutely expected.
Harry himself did not change much from the fifth and sixth books. The only emotion in him that was convincing was anger. He seemed to feel angry at everything, his friends, his enemies, the world, everything. All other emotions were not convincing at all. His love for Ginny is not very well-written, because it just sounds fake. Rowling would be a failure at writing romance novels, because every emotion Harry feels for Ginny is put into words that look like they're copied out of some corny old romance. His acceptance of death near the end would have been convincingly written if she did not make the acceptance so sudden. It felt like one moment he was looking in the Pensieve and seeing Snape's history, all prepared to fight Voldemort and save everybody, and the next he was just content to accept death. Just like that. I mean, surely some internal struggle should've been made. Someone like Harry doesn't just accept death unless he's sure he can take Voldemort down with him. Harry is not the type to just die, content with detroying just part of Voldemort's soul, and leaving the Snake to Neville. He hates to endanger anyone, and it would've taken at least some thought for him to realize that some things he can trust to his friends.
As for Voldemort, still the same. Evil character, but no depth at all. Simply evil by birth and nature, it seems. You can tell a little from his past, but it all you can see is a troubled childhood. Nothign else hints at anything that would cause extreme evil to bud in Voldemort. He just feels like a simple target for the good guys to oppose.
Anywyas, glad that HP is finally over...
Also, I was surprised that Neville and Luna continued Dumbeldore's army and Neville suceeds in becoming the Herbology teacher of Hogwart's.
to tie it in with Snape... he has been "good while seemingly bad" ever since the first book. I'll admit I had my doubts at the end of book 6 but there is no question that Rowling paints him (and intended to paint him, double agent as he is) as brave and courageous and as having done something extremely necessary and admirable. But do the ends justify the means that Snape used (and, by extension, that Dumbledore, who apparently commissioned Snape to be a double agent, also used)? Rowling seems to think so. Does she give any indication otherwise?
I personally was just let down by the fact that so much of this book was spent hiding out in tents in the middle of nowhere for Harry, Ron and Hermione. There is just such a sluggish pace to the body of it; understandably, Harry himself has great difficulty in putting together ideas of where the Horcruxes might be and acting on them, and in turn, Hermione and especially Ron get very impatient with the whole process, but as said before, there is very little underlying current going on here. It almost seems that in her eagerness to finish the series, JK lost some of the interest in her characters and just sort of connected the dots, as opposed to making a truly enthralling addition and ending to her odyssey. I was disappointed by the fact that more action and plot did not take place in or around Hogwarts itself, the central point of every other book. True, the three had dropped out and since Harry was "Undesirable Number One", it was extremely hard for them to get in or out of the grounds, but it just seemed so separate from the rest of the books of the series, so alien. Hogwarts was the base for all the adventures, and though it ultimately ends there, it just seemed forced, as if JK knew that everyone expected and wanted Harry to return there somehow, so she just threw it in for good measure, almost as an afterthought. I heard JK say in an interview that Deathly Hallows felt like an extension of Half-Blood Prince to her, but I could not disagree more. There is fire, passion, electricity and intrigue in HBP, which is missing for the most part in DH. I am so glad the Snape got a reprieve in this one as I always wanted to think the best of both he and Dumbledore, and that does considerably lighten the tone, but the doubt and supposed misdeeds of Albus Dumbledore woven throughout this book really kind of squash whatever jubilant rejoicing that he welcomed his own death that there is. To me, all victory achieved in this one is overshadowed by doubt, lies, anger, failure and idleness. I know too well that in the case of real wars, this can be true and I do appreciate that JKR was trying to portray the cost of sacrifice for her cause, the war against Voldie, but I just wish that she had taken maybe a while longer to write the last book and stalled less in Harry's Horcrux progress, which would have made for a more exciting and satisfying ending. I did not like how one minute, Harry had defeated Voldemort and it was all over, then the next, it was nineteen years later and all was well, either. I think she should have left a little more room for grieving and the healing of the Wizarding World, showing what happened immediately after the war, so that the true weight of everyone's sacrifice could truly be felt, which seems to be her ultimate intention. I agree with the person above that stated that this book was rather anti-climactic and that the characters became rather hollow, but I suppose I cannot complain unless i myself attempt to write a series of novels myself. Additionally, why couldn't Dolores Umbridge have met a fitting end, she certainly deserved it! And poor, poor Dobby and Hedwig! Those two deaths actually upset me more than anything. Ah, well...I guess now it's all over...
By the way, I disagree that 9 year-olds cannot grasp the depth of loss and suffering in the last few books. My daughter is exactly nine and is in the middle of Order, and has seen all of the movies thus far. She not only takes a very mature view of the dark events surrounding Mr. Potter's adventures, but has a very unique way of offering her own explanation of things. She explained to me not that long ago, after we went to see Order together in the theatres and she was bothered by the loss of Sirius, that the bad stuff that happens in the books and movies makes the good even stronger. I thought that was a most prolific and enlightened thing for a nine-year-old to say and that it illustrated that kids can understand and interpret a lot more than we think they can. And though I do agree that some (minimal) parental guidance is needed for certain aspects of HP, I firmly believe that children need to form their own thoughts and ideas regarding negative events, such as death, violence and loss, because such things are part of life and are inevitable. If they cannot learn how to function during these times and do not have the resources inside themselves to cope, they will not be strong enough to withstand such real tragedies and will be shrinking little shadows of themselves, which could lead to depression, drug and alcohol abuse and worse. By experiencing these devastating events in a safe arena like literature, allowing themselves to feel the impact of such things at a safe distance, they learn the skills of self-reliance, critical thinking, independence and hope, which does conquer all. Not to say that I do not think that children need guidelines for what they can and cannot do/read/see, I am a huge advocate for parental guidance and parents screening things before their children are exposed to them. I also believe that if they are not exposed to enough, they will not survive in the real world and they therefore will not achieve their personal best in life. I do think that adult society, on the whole, does not realize how clearly children see and interpret things, how pure their thought processes are. I personally always trust the judgement of a child and I will not restrict my children from forming views or opinions of anything on their own.
I guess that's what makes me wonder about all the children I see reading HP. I have doubts about whether their parents are aware of all the deaths, etc., or if they only read the first one and assumed they would all be like that one (i.e., very little death of heroes, primary characters, people the reader is emotionally invested in, etc).