Login | Register
 
Message Board | Latest Posts | Your Recent Posts | Rules

Thread: Neo-Elvish Languages

Is this discussion interesting? Share it on Twitter!

Bottom of Page    Message Board > Speaking > Neo-Elvish Languages   
I've been trying to learn Quenya and Sindarin, and I've found quite a few good sites on the internet teaching them. Obviously, the languages as Tolkien wrote them are incomplete, and the "Elvish" on those sites is mostly made up by fans, and so is not what Tolkien would have envisioned. However, people are always adding and changing words in real languages (at least English), so I think Tolkien probably expected that his languages would be modified in later years. Perhaps what can be learned on the internet is not "neo-" at all, but can truly be called Tolkien's elvish.

I just wanted to start some conversation on speaking elvish, so I thought that I'd bring up my idea, and see what other folks on PT thought about it.

I hope this is the right place to put this thread, but if not, I'll move it wherever I'm told is best.

I've been interested in trying to learn some form of Elvish aswell. Do you have any recommendations on good sites to check out?  

In the interview Tolkien in Oxford JRRT replies...

'No. No. No. I wouldn't mind other people knowing it, and enjoying it, but I didn't really want to, like some people who have been equally inventive in languages [? desiring ?] to sort of make cults and have people speaking it all together, no, I don't desire to go and have an afternoon talking Elvish to chaps. For one thing of course Elvish is too complicated. I've never finished making it.'

JRRT

And in any case the Neo-elvish on the web is not simply full of neologisms [not that you said so Galandir], but represents an artificial selecting of material from various stages or phases of the invention process, or as Carl Hostetter [of the Elvish Linguistic Fellowship] briefly describes them: 'artificial, simplified, patch-work systems'

Carl also writes:

'The fact is that, to the extent that we can speak accurately of Quenya and Sindarin as single entities at all, it is only as continuities of change over time, i.e. as processes; all else is simply individual snapshots of (most often only small parts of) this process, any detail of which may have persisted from the beginning to the end of that process, or have had no more extent in that process than the sheet it was written on; and in some cases there may be no way to tell which of these two extremes is true of any given detail.' from the FAQ over at E.L.F.

Some may disagree with that... I however agree Smile Smilie

Plus we must remember that so much of what Tolkien put to paper was not only subject to change, but was never put into a 'finalized' form meant for readers -- publication. Etymologies, for one example, provides a lot of 'the corpus' -- but what it really is is an abandoned document, a document written before major historic changes were to take place...

... and here I mean Tolkien drastically changed the history of his languages and put Etymologies aside, so that the relationships of various Elvish tongues [to each other] in Etymologies was no longer true, never mind whether or not individual words or grammatical details would necessarily be carried forward when 'Noldorin' essentially became Sindarin, for example.

If we think of the amount of Elvish Tolkien actually published it is relatively small, and JRRT could not resist changing some of that [already published material] between editions! That doesn't mean I toss aside everything else he wrote, certainly not, but what I do often enough see, or seem to see anyway, is Tolkien 'inventing' on the spot and enjoying it. And as Carl Hostetter also underlines, Tolkien not only never 'finished' any of his invented languages...

... he doesn't appear to really be trying to finish any of them, as in, he didn't desire to make them finished enough for others, or himself, to learn how to speak.