Interesting discussion going on here, I was having a similar discussion with some people over at CoE the other day on sort of the same topic.
I personally have never read any of the HP series, and I highly doubt I ever will. Nor have I seen the movies. For whatever reasons, HP has just never appealed to me in any way. I know so many people who have read those books, including some highly intelligent people who I really respect, and I’ve heard nothing but good things. I have nothing against HP whatsoever, but I just don’t care. Again, for whatever reasons, HP just doesn’t appeal to me.
However, even though I haven’t personally read the books, I would never sit here and say that they are crap either. Like I said, I’ve heard very good things from people whose opinions I highly respect, and trust. I think those books have accomplished a lot of positives things. They are getting so many people to read, especially young boys and that’s a good thing no matter what. Plus I really feel like those books can, and will be a stepping-stone for a lot of young minds to other greater postAuthorIDs like Tolkien, etc. So by all means, for all you HP fans, please keep reading!
You can’t try to compare HP to Tolkien. That’s like trying to compare hamburger to filet mingon (my apologies to all you vegetarians out there). What I'm saying is that nothing in the fantasy genre (and really almost anything else) can measure up to Tolkien. I think Grondy said it pretty well with this comment;
Quote:
The books of the two postAuthorIDs are just of different styles and written for different people. One shouldn't compare the Harry Potter and the .... books to LotR, but might do so to The Hobbit.
Even though they're both in the fantasy genre, that’s exactly it. They're different styles of writing, and written for different people. J.K. Rowling has written her books specifically for children, but they’re so good that they have ended up appealing to a much larger demographic.
I don’t see her as a copycat at all, she has created her own world, her own stories, her own characters, and they are unique to her. Yes, undoubtedly she has been influenced by Tolkien’s work, but as a fantasy writer, it would be impossible not to be. Also, from what I understand Rowling got most of her names from some oddball floral/plant book. Names like Voldemort, etc., come from this plant book, not from stealing things from Tolkien. Furthermore, as Kaimelar and others have already pointed out in this thread, there are certain elements, and sort of a certain basic structure that has to be adhered to when one is writing fantasy, that’s what makes it fantasy!
Even though I haven’t read her books, I really admire, and respect J.K. Rowling. If you know anything about her personal history, it really is quite an amazing success story, and I’m happy for her that things have worked out for her the way that they have (even though I know she is starting to find it all a bit overwhelming). As an postAuthorID she has managed to climb a very difficult mountain, and she now finds herself above the clouds, atop the highest peak, and she should be commended for it.
Again though, you can’t compare her works to Tolkien's, because even though she has managed to make it to the top of the mountain (a difficult task indeed), Tolkien
is all the stars in the infinite universe that she, and everyone else is looking up at, and forever will be.